Dear All,
Couple months ago we posted a question 'Where to Invest' in this forum. We recieved many responses and we decided to invest money into IRA. So, Year long question Roth or Traditional: so, we came across few calculators, which would tell us how much money would you make with Traditional vs Roth.
Let's use some numbers. Assuming we are investing $5500 per year for next 27 years, we would invest $148,500 and with an interest rate of 5.5% would receive $342,284. Now, for Roth account, this will be a take home amount (ignoring other fees). However, for Traditional it would be $359,609 (assuming 25% tax bracket now, 15% at retirement, this is likely for us). The Traditional account will be charged $51,343 in taxes, but the 'Value of reinvesting tax savings' would be $68,668. So, $359,609 is estimated by adding difference of taxes and reinvestment value. In nutshell, we think, this result implies that Traditional is better.
Here is the question, we have maxed out the 401k contribution and have been investing in 529 for our son. Thus, how can we get the 'Value of reinvesting tax savings'? Although I agree that one would get more tax breaks with Traditional, unless he/she reinvest that money in market, one would not see the benefits. In our situation, reinvestment may mean investing money in stock/bonds/gold etc. I think, this math is misleading. Especially, when difference would be only $17k and I am not sold on Traditional account yet. That being said, it feels like Roth is more meaningful here. Can somebody shed some light on it or direct us to a thread? Are we missing something?
Thanks.
J & A
Couple months ago we posted a question 'Where to Invest' in this forum. We recieved many responses and we decided to invest money into IRA. So, Year long question Roth or Traditional: so, we came across few calculators, which would tell us how much money would you make with Traditional vs Roth.
Let's use some numbers. Assuming we are investing $5500 per year for next 27 years, we would invest $148,500 and with an interest rate of 5.5% would receive $342,284. Now, for Roth account, this will be a take home amount (ignoring other fees). However, for Traditional it would be $359,609 (assuming 25% tax bracket now, 15% at retirement, this is likely for us). The Traditional account will be charged $51,343 in taxes, but the 'Value of reinvesting tax savings' would be $68,668. So, $359,609 is estimated by adding difference of taxes and reinvestment value. In nutshell, we think, this result implies that Traditional is better.
Here is the question, we have maxed out the 401k contribution and have been investing in 529 for our son. Thus, how can we get the 'Value of reinvesting tax savings'? Although I agree that one would get more tax breaks with Traditional, unless he/she reinvest that money in market, one would not see the benefits. In our situation, reinvestment may mean investing money in stock/bonds/gold etc. I think, this math is misleading. Especially, when difference would be only $17k and I am not sold on Traditional account yet. That being said, it feels like Roth is more meaningful here. Can somebody shed some light on it or direct us to a thread? Are we missing something?
Thanks.
J & A
Comment