The Saving Advice Forums - A classic personal finance community.

Lawsuit Against The City of Cleveland

Collapse
X
Collapse
Forum Posts
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lawsuit Against The City of Cleveland

    I know there are a few pro-gun people on this forum, so I thought a few of you might be interested in the lawsuit my organization is in the process of filing against the City of Cleveland.

    (I am one of the leaders with Buckeye firearms Association and the Buckeye firearms foundation).

    ***********
    The Law Applies to the Little People in Cleveland, but Not Mayor Jackson?

    Fresh on the heels of a poll naming Cleveland the second least-desirable U.S. city to live in, Mayor Jackson appears determined to make a run at the top spot as Cleveland continues to be the only municipality in Ohio illegally enforcing local firearm laws. The victims? Cleveland's own taxpayers.

    Local firearm laws were preempted by HB347, as was affirmed by the Ohio Supreme Court. Despite this legal reality, Cleveland continues to throw the legal equivalent of a temper tantrum by filing charges against tax payers for possessing unregistered handguns.

    Buckeye Firearms Foundation will stop Cleveland and other cities like it from targeting gun owners like you. We must ask for your help with funding. Through Buckeye, all gun owners can act together so that no gun owner will be left facing a rogue city alone.

    Readers of this website are familiar with the Cleveland Plain Dealer story which first reported that Mayor Jackson ordered the police to continue to enforce local ordinances, despite preemption.

    Readers of this website are also aware that Mayor Jackson attempted to backpedal from his earlier defiance, claiming in another Plain Dealer story that the registration of firearms was "voluntary" while also having the spokesperson take the fall by claiming he was not authorized ever to speak for the Mayor’s office.

    Judging by breaking news events described below, Cleveland, it would appear, thinks "register or we will criminally charge you" is voluntary.

    Damon Wells is a young Cleveland resident and crime victim who managed to make it through a horrific ordeal. Wells, confronted by two young criminals, was forced to defend himself, killing one of the attackers. Unfortunately, Damon's recovery could not begin from this point forward, because a misguided community turned out with teddy bear shrines for the fallen probationer/thug, and subsequently vandalized Damon’s house. The victim continued to be victimized until the NAACP volunteered, along with off-duty Cleveland police, to stay with Damon at his house and provide protection. Damon's only comments about the armed robber were "It is good to know he was loved by people ... tell his family I am sorry."

    The accomplice attacker was charged and convicted, and Damon never faced criminal charges. As Buckeye Firearms Association and the Plain Dealer reported, Damon Wells had to fight to get police to return the gun he used to defend himself. The City apparently was not amused that a mere citizen would insist on the return of a legally-owned firearm.

    Some months after the Court ordered Cleveland to return Damon’s handgun, Damon, who is a young, black male, was a passenger in a motor vehicle subjected to a traffic stop. Damon complied with all areas of state law in notifying the officer of his licensed, armed status. Despite his compliance with state law and lack of any other criminal conduct, Cleveland charged Damon, who has a valid Ohio Concealed Handgun License, with carrying an unregistered handgun.

    It was only after Buckeye Firearms Association provided coverage of Damon's case, as well as two other persons charged with possessing unregistered handguns, that Mayor Jackson did an about-face with the Plain Dealer and announced that registration was voluntary. A motion to dismiss charges was filed in Damon's case, and the court granted the motion in November of 2008.

    Apparently infuriated that the law provides for mandatory attorney fees in cases where a gun owner succeeds in thwarting illegal efforts by a city to enforce local ordinances, Chief Prosecutor Victor Perez ordered that charges for the same incident be re-filed against Damon Wells. That is right - no new incident or facts - they just want a "do-over," and rather than bothering to file an appeal it is easier to just re-charge the same indigent Defendant.

    Damon has received legal counsel to defend himself against the criminal charges at no cost, and he will continue to receive legal defense in his criminal case. However, one thing is clear: Cleveland will continue this behavior in Damon's case, and others, until they are finally ordered to cease enforcing all of their local firearm ordinances. There is also a very serious threat of other cities around Ohio following Cleveland's lead, so we must act NOW.

    Cleveland will continue this behavior until a court orders them to stop.

    For more info:Help Buckeye Firearms stop Cleveland's abuse of law-abiding gun owners | Buckeye Firearms Association
    Last edited by Angio333; 02-18-2009, 07:34 PM.

  • #2
    We filed the lawsuit today!

    Buckeye Firearms Foundation sues Cleveland to stop enforcement of unconstitutional gun laws | Buckeye Firearms Association

    Comment


    • #3
      The arrogance of some of these public officials is astounding. Many big city mayors behave very similarly. What part of the law don't they get. It's like the power goes to their head and they do as they wish thinking they can't be stopped. Mr. Damon did nothing wrong in this case. I've worked in law enforcement for many years in the state of Ohio. There are many that think you can just dial 911 and all problems will be solved. It simply doesn't work that way when danger is eminent.
      Last edited by GREENBACK; 02-24-2009, 03:37 PM.
      "Those who can't remember the past are condemmed to repeat it".- George Santayana.

      Comment


      • #4
        I worked with Damon to get his gun back after he used it to legally defend himself. The city actually wanted him to write a paper to the safety director explaining why he thinks he should be allowed to get his gun back. He was the victim! They even gave him trouble after he got the court order.

        Other people from Buckeye worked with him on the handgun registration incident. Again, he did nothing illegal.

        They have been going after gun owners who are obeying the law instead of going after real criminals.

        Comment


        • #5
          Angio333, thanks for the update. Please keep us posted, if not here, then maybe on a blog? I am intensely interested in these erosions of our civil rights. Thank you for your action!

          Comment


          • #6
            We update our website with gun related news and articles everyday Monday - Friday. A majority of the articles are relative to Ohio or gun rights in general. Updates of the case will be on the website, and I'll update this post.

            We also have a free email newsletter. If you sign up, you get a free 38 page e-booklet on how to fight for our gun rights.

            Buckeye Firearms Association | Defending Your Firearm Rights

            Thanks for your interest!

            Comment


            • #7
              I'm not from Cleveland but I am from Ohio.

              Kudos to you I completely agree!

              Comment

              Working...