The Saving Advice Forums - A classic personal finance community.

What should a "typical" middle class couple "have" by age 40?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Yes the formula is skewed. At 18, I moved out of the house and went to college. I made about 10000/year. I was supposed to have 9000 saved JUST to be an AAW. For PAW, I would have had to have 36000 saved.

    Comment


    • #17
      Gee, we're only Average Accumulators and I thought we're doing great . Well, I'm fine because if we were more aggressive savers and investors than we're now, we'd deprive ourselves of some small indulgences and/or I would worry more about the stock market and not sleep well at night.

      Comment


      • #18
        Here I thought I was just a grandma, but I am also a PAW!!

        Comment


        • #19
          deleted
          Last edited by gamecock43; 05-28-2008, 08:25 AM.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by MonkeyMama View Post
            I like David Marotta's advice on the subject:

            http://www.savingadvice.com/blog/200...net-worth.html
            I found this interesting, but I missed a little bit more of elaborate explanation about annual spending. Does he refer to 'this number' times your CURRENT spending? E.g. we invest in taxable accounts + save. It seems like a cash out as if spending. What about mortgage payments and childcare costs? Then there will be healthcare insurance costs once retired.

            I like the concept though.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by aida2003 View Post
              I found this interesting, but I missed a little bit more of elaborate explanation about annual spending. Does he refer to 'this number' times your CURRENT spending? E.g. we invest in taxable accounts + save. It seems like a cash out as if spending. What about mortgage payments and childcare costs? Then there will be healthcare insurance costs once retired.

              I like the concept though.
              yes, current spending I believe. Not savings like investments. But would include mortgage and childcare costs.

              However, you can tweak this if you know your retirement spending will be much higher than current spending. In that case I would go with expected retirement spending, personally.

              Though I personally expect more expenses in retirement, I don't expect them to suddenly rise dramatically in retirement. Plus we will be trading in costs like raising children for costs like more expensive healthcare. So I am quite happy with the "current spending" formula. Our income has been all over the place for the last 10 years but ever since we have owned a home our annual expenses have been in the same ballpark. So I personally like this methodology. It also accounts for the fact that you should be saving a larger amount as you age (&/or realizing higher investment return as your investments grow).

              It's also very in line with an "It's not what you make, but what you keep" mentality. IF you live on less it is easier to reach these goals.
              Last edited by MonkeyMama; 05-28-2008, 11:19 AM.

              Comment

              Working...
              X