WSJ.com article: "Is that iPad 2 really worth $2000?"
I noticed this article and thought immediately of everybody here... it seems like just the line of thought many of us might take. However, my question is just that -- Who actually considers future value of money spent today? Do you look at an altogether frivolous purchase (computer/gadget, new shoes, or whatever else strikes your fancy) in terms of what the cost of the item will prevent you from having in retirement?
Personally, I don't. In fairness, I speak from the perspective of one who is fairly comfortable financially... But I'm coming more and more to think of money as a means of making my life interesting. Whether it's for a $2k trip to northern Japan for a week of snowboarding or a $3k piano plus $15/wk lessons, I see money as an enabler of what I enjoy. As long as I know that I'm taking care of myself for the future, I'm growing increasingly willing to spend the remainder on whatever might strike me, without even considering what that $70 boat dive trip might mean for me 40 years from now.
So what about the rest of you? Do you agree with the article's writer, or are you of a different persuasion?
I noticed this article and thought immediately of everybody here... it seems like just the line of thought many of us might take. However, my question is just that -- Who actually considers future value of money spent today? Do you look at an altogether frivolous purchase (computer/gadget, new shoes, or whatever else strikes your fancy) in terms of what the cost of the item will prevent you from having in retirement?
Personally, I don't. In fairness, I speak from the perspective of one who is fairly comfortable financially... But I'm coming more and more to think of money as a means of making my life interesting. Whether it's for a $2k trip to northern Japan for a week of snowboarding or a $3k piano plus $15/wk lessons, I see money as an enabler of what I enjoy. As long as I know that I'm taking care of myself for the future, I'm growing increasingly willing to spend the remainder on whatever might strike me, without even considering what that $70 boat dive trip might mean for me 40 years from now.
So what about the rest of you? Do you agree with the article's writer, or are you of a different persuasion?
Comment