The Saving Advice Forums - A classic personal finance community.

Is Wachovia next?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is Wachovia next?

    My money's on Wachovia to be the next bank to fold, to be purchased by Wells Fargo. This morning, pre-market trading is averaging less then $5.00, a more than 50% drop in the previous close of $10 a share.

  • #2
    Yikes! That's a serious drop....

    However, please remember that intra-day price fluctuations are a reflection of market sentiment, not always a direct correlation to the company's actual financial health. I think it was only a couple of weeks ago that Goldman Sachs dropped down to $80 or $90 in one day due to panic selling.

    On the other hand, that market sentiment is mostly likely due to the company's financial health. Wachovia has undoubtedly been weakened by Golden West, so yes, either a sell-off or seizure is very likely.

    Still, it's worth noting that pre-market trading for the entire financial sector is down today, not just Wachovia. For that matter, overall futures today is substantially down as well.

    ---

    While I'm here, I do find it interesting that Wells Fargo of all people are talking to Wachovia. Wells Fargo is notoriously conservative, and has been weathering all this economic fallout rather well thanks to their general aversion to risky lending in the first place. On top that, they have come out and said that they're not interested in large acquisitions, preferring small bites at a time. So, what is possessing Wells Fargo to do merger talk with Wachovia of all people? I don't know, but I'm going to chaulk this mere speculation for now, until somebody inks a deal.
    Last edited by Broken Arrow; 09-29-2008, 05:52 AM. Reason: Mix-up. My bad.

    Comment


    • #3
      Damn, Citi just acquired them!

      Comment


      • #4
        Oh yeah, I just saw that too. Citigroup makes more sense, although I was mentioning elsewhere that the merger of these two would be simply putting two large risky banks together into one larger risky bank. I don't think I'll be touching the Citigroup stock for a while.

        But that's good news for Wachovia customers.

        (Edit: Geez! The stock slid into 90% loss at less than $1 before stopping around when news of the Citigroup acquisition was made public.)
        Last edited by Broken Arrow; 09-29-2008, 06:04 AM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Yeah. I really thought Wells was going to buy them to extend their reach nationally, as that would put them in position to compete with JPM and BOA... But I bet they weren't willing to absorb the $42B of losses like Citi just did!

          Comment


          • #6
            Well, there were news articles that mentioned Wachovia in "advanced talks" with Wells, so no one can be blamed for thinking that a merger may come out of that. It's just that they have such a diametrically opposite culture, I just find that bit hard to swallow.

            Wells as it is right now is already massive ($120B), and unlike J.P. Morgan and Bank of America, they carry little or no sub-prime related debts. You don't have to be the biggest to be the strongest, and pound-per-pound, I think Wells is actually the strongest of them all. In fact, Wells is actually one of the few financials I use as a reference to gauge the true overall health in the sector. In other words, if the likes of Wells goes down, then I'll know it's time to start panicking.
            Last edited by Broken Arrow; 09-29-2008, 06:30 AM.

            Comment


            • #7
              FDIC: Press Releases - PR-88-2008 9/29/2008

              Comment


              • #8


                How long before JPM changes that banner? Citi now leads deposits at $1.3T, against JPM's <$1T.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Wachovia = FAIL

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    citi group brought wachovia assets.

                    AMERICA'S MONEY CRISIS
                    Bank bailouts sweep Europe
                    Stocks tumble as worries persist
                    Financial rescue 101: What's in the bill
                    Fed battles credit crisis
                    U.S. probes Fannie, Freddie

                    Following weeks of speculation about its fate, Wachovia said Monday it would sell its banking assets to rival Citigroup, marking yet another seismic shift in the U.S. banking industry.
                    Bush pushes bailout plan

                    More Videos
                    Quick Vote
                    Does the bipartisan bailout proposal do enough to protect taxpayers?
                    YesNo or View results
                    NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Citigroup will acquire the banking operations of Wachovia for $2.2 billion in an all-stock deal, following much speculation over the weekend about the fate of the nation's fourth-largest bank.

                    Citigroup, the nation's largest bank based on assets, also announced it would raise $10 billion through a sale of common stock and that it would slash its quarterly dividend yet again, cutting it in half to 16 cents a share to preserve capital.

                    As part of the deal, Citigroup will acquire Wachovia's massive deposit network, about $53 billion in the company's debt, as well as more than $300 billion of Wachovia's loan portfolio.

                    Following completion of the acquisition, Citigroup will have more than $600 billion in deposits in the U.S., about a 9.8% market share. Total deposits worldwide will be $1.3 trillion.

                    Citigroup said it will absorb up to $42 billion of losses on those loans, while the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation will be on the hook for anything beyond that.

                    The FDIC noted that Wachovia did not qualify as a failed bank, unlike Washington Mutual, which collapsed last Thursday, only to be subsequently purchased by JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500).

                    Regulators also stressed that consumers who bank with Wachovia would not experience any interruption in service and that their deposits remained protected.

                    "Today's action will ensure seamless continuity of service from their bank and full protection for all of their deposits," said FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair.

                    Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit called the transaction "extremely attractive" from a strategic perspective, saying it would augment the company's access to funding and liquidity.

                    Banking regulators, who helped broker the deal following consultations with President Bush, the Federal Reserve and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, viewed the deal as necessary to avoid what could have been a painful fallout for both the economy and the already fragile financial system.

                    "A failure of Wachovia would have posed a systemic risk," Paulson said in a statement.

                    Wachovia plunges but company isn't completely disappearing
                    Shares of Wachovia (WB, Fortune 500) were halted when the stock market opened Monday. The stock plunged more than 90% in pre-market trading, to 94 cents a share. Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) shares edged higher in morning trading.

                    However, Wachovia will remain a publicly traded company -- albeit in much smaller form.

                    The Charlotte, N.C.-based firm will hold onto its massive brokerage business, which grew substantially following its $6.7 billion acquisition of A.G. Edwards last year. Wachovia also owns the Evergreen investment management division, which had more than $245 billion in assets as of June 30.

                    Heading into the weekend there was rampant speculation that the Charlotte, N.C.-based Wachovia would be sold to either Citigroup or Wells Fargo (WFC, Fortune 500). Even Spain's Banco Santander (STD) had been mentioned as a possible bidder. By Sunday evening, a bidding war between the two banking giants was underway, The New York Times reported.

                    There had also been talk in recent weeks that Morgan Stanley (MS, Fortune 500), which recently converted itself into a commercial bank from a stand-alone investment bank, was discussing a possible merger with Wachovia.

                    Following a string of high-profile collapses of banks in recent weeks including WaMu and the demise of Lehman Brothers, there has been increasing speculation that Wachovia could be the next one to go.

                    Like many of its peers, Wachovia bet big on the U.S. mortgage market, which prompted it to suffer losses over the past two quarters.

                    Some analysts have blamed the company's ill-timed 2006 acquisition of the California mortgage lender Golden West Financial Corp. for the company's woes.

                    Risky move for Citi
                    At the same time, Citigroup has been no picture of health. The New York City-based financial services giant has posted close to $18 billion in losses over the past three quarters, while taking nearly $50 billion in writedowns on its diverse loan portfolio.

                    The deal for Wachovia also comes as somewhat of a surprise given recent efforts by Citi's leadership to shrink the company.

                    Citigroup's Pandit, who was installed as the company's chief executive last December, unveiled plans in May to unload more than $400 billion in assets over the next few years in the hopes of turning the company around.

                    The deal, which comes ahead of a Congressional vote on a proposed $700 billion bailout for the financial system, marks yet another big shake-up of the nation's banking industry.

                    In the past two weeks, the sector has undergone a dramatic transformation, including Lehman's bankruptcy, the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) and the government takeover of insurer AIG (AIG, Fortune 500).
                    _________________

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X