While visiting my family for Christmas, a car commercial came on that stated they could offer an 84 month loan. My mother made a comment, something along the lines of "who would ever take an 84 month loan, you would never pay that off".
Now, it was no secret that I had been saving to pay cash for a new truck, but since mine had broken down, I went ahead and made the purchase, $5,000 down. Also I had shared with her that for the first payment I wrote the largest check of my life at $20,000, and that next month I am sending in one for $10,000 and I'll be done. I replied to her that "I took out a 72 month loan for the truck, and over that period I'd have to pay $6,000 in interest, but being that I plan to have it paid off by March, the total interest would be just a couple hundred bucks".
Much to my surprise, she just this statement of facts upset her, and snapped at me "Not everyone could write a $20,000 check".
I new better than continue the conversation, but I stated that anyone could put back $100-200 a month and in just a couple years could pay cash for a vehicle, may a $3000 beater, but they wouldn't be paying interest on a 5 year plus loan. She then informed me that I "wasn't living in the real world and I didn't understand".
Yesterday at work I was discussing an upcoming local election with a coworker and how one candidate had been quoted saying he wanted to open the prisons. We went on to discuss reforms to marijuana legislation and how if it was made legal, we both agreed people in jail for having it should probably be let out, but not those who sold it.
At this point another coworker chimed in that some people have to sale drugs to support their family. Of course I am not going near this so I removed myself from the conversation. The first coworker said "no one has to sell drugs". The second coworker stated "Where I come from they do. You can't see life from my point of view. You'll never understand".
Does claiming "you don't understand" from a point of ignorance? Or is it a lazy means to shut a conversation down? Etc "I'm right and you're wrong" or "Because I said so".
Now, it was no secret that I had been saving to pay cash for a new truck, but since mine had broken down, I went ahead and made the purchase, $5,000 down. Also I had shared with her that for the first payment I wrote the largest check of my life at $20,000, and that next month I am sending in one for $10,000 and I'll be done. I replied to her that "I took out a 72 month loan for the truck, and over that period I'd have to pay $6,000 in interest, but being that I plan to have it paid off by March, the total interest would be just a couple hundred bucks".
Much to my surprise, she just this statement of facts upset her, and snapped at me "Not everyone could write a $20,000 check".
I new better than continue the conversation, but I stated that anyone could put back $100-200 a month and in just a couple years could pay cash for a vehicle, may a $3000 beater, but they wouldn't be paying interest on a 5 year plus loan. She then informed me that I "wasn't living in the real world and I didn't understand".
Yesterday at work I was discussing an upcoming local election with a coworker and how one candidate had been quoted saying he wanted to open the prisons. We went on to discuss reforms to marijuana legislation and how if it was made legal, we both agreed people in jail for having it should probably be let out, but not those who sold it.
At this point another coworker chimed in that some people have to sale drugs to support their family. Of course I am not going near this so I removed myself from the conversation. The first coworker said "no one has to sell drugs". The second coworker stated "Where I come from they do. You can't see life from my point of view. You'll never understand".
Does claiming "you don't understand" from a point of ignorance? Or is it a lazy means to shut a conversation down? Etc "I'm right and you're wrong" or "Because I said so".
Comment