My take on Suze's approach is purely based on numbers. So its not about whether Suze likes what the caller's is buying. She tries to take out her emotions (dislikes/stupid or silly) and based it on caller's financial situation; income/savings/retirement far exceeds debts. It's common sense approach we all generally go by. It wouldn't be silly to me to approved or denied anyone if she or he wants to buy an luxury Porche 911 Turbo which cost $120K. But you have to show me substantial income/pension/savings/retirements in relations to your existing debt. Of course, the key word is Substantial. That's how I would based my decision and I don't see nothing wrong with common sense approach.
Now whether or not someone dislike the common sense approach because it's perceived it as "wasteful", its sort of big brother "1984" socialistic view.
If I was the person buying the 911 Turbo responsibly, I wouldn't personally give a HOOT what other people thinks cuz it's my money, my life, and wouldn't even care whatever socialistic view spite of what you think.
Now whether or not someone dislike the common sense approach because it's perceived it as "wasteful", its sort of big brother "1984" socialistic view.
If I was the person buying the 911 Turbo responsibly, I wouldn't personally give a HOOT what other people thinks cuz it's my money, my life, and wouldn't even care whatever socialistic view spite of what you think.
Comment