The Saving Advice Forums - A classic personal finance community.

FDA to Phase out certain food dyes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FDA to Phase out certain food dyes

    FDA announces food dye ban

    Health and Science FDA to phase out dyes used in Flamin’ Hot Cheetos, Skittles and other snacks


    Published Tue, Apr 22 20254:22 PM EDTUpdated Tue, Apr 22 20255:16 PM EDT

    Amelia Lucas@Thxamelian

    Annika Kim Constantino@annikakimc
    ShareShare Article via FacebookShare Article via TwitterShare Article via LinkedInShare Article via Email
    Key Points
    • The Food and Drug Administration is phasing out the use of artificial dyes by the end of next year.
    • The policy change will hit food and drink companies like PepsiCo, General Mills and WK Kellogg.
    • The so-called Make America Healthy Again platform argues a corrupt alliance of drug and food companies and the federal health agencies that regulate them are making Americans less healthy.


    Candy is displayed for sale, as U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., along with FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, announce the FDA’s intent to remove from the U.S. food supply “petroleum-based synthetic” food dyes, which are present in numerous foods such as breakfast cereals, candy, snacks, and beverages, at a grocery store in Medford, Massachusetts, U.S., April 22, 2025.
    Brian Snyder | Reuters

    The fluorescent red of Flamin’ Hot Cheetos, the brilliant teal of Mountain Dew Baja Blast and the colorful rainbow of Skittles may soon be dimmed.

    The Food and Drug Administration is phasing out the use of petroleum-based synthetic dyes by the end of next year, the agency announced on Tuesday.

    “For the last 50 years, American children have increasingly been living in a toxic soup of synthetic chemicals,” FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said at a press conference.

    Food and beverage companies use additives like red dye 40 to give cereal, chips, sports drinks and other products bright hues that attract shoppers. But backlash against artificial colorants has been brewing in the U.S. for more than a decade.

    The changes will affect a slew of food giants, including PepsiCo, General Mills, Mars and WK Kellogg. The industry has argued that the claims about the dangers of artificial dyes lack evidence that would support any bans.

    As of Tuesday, the FDA and the food industry don’t have a formal agreement to remove artificial dyes but instead “an understanding,” according to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. It is unclear what enforcement actions the agency would take if food and beverage companies do not comply.

    “There are a number of tools at our disposal,” Makary said. “I believe in love, let’s start in a friendly way and see if we can do this without any statutory or regulatory changes, but we are exploring every tool in the toolbox to make sure this gets done very quickly. And they want to do it — so why go down a complicated road with Congress?”

    The FDA is taking several actions, including setting a “national standard” and timeline for the food industry to transition from petroleum-based food dyes to natural alternatives, according to Makary. The agency is also initiating a process to revoke authorization of synthetic food colorings, including those not in production, within the coming weeks.

    He added that the FDA is also eliminating the remaining six synthetic dyes on the market from the U.S. food supply by the end of the year, specifically red dye 40, yellow dye 5, yellow dye 6, blue dye 1, blue dye 2 and green dye 2. It is also requesting food companies to phase out red dye 3 by the end of next year, which is sooner than the 2027 to 2028 deadline previously announced, according to Makary.

    “For companies that are currently using petroleum based red dye, try watermelon juice or beet juice. For companies currently combining petroleum-based yellow chemical and red dyes together, try carrot juice,” he said.


    U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Marty Makary holds up a study from The Lancet during an announcement of the FDA’s intent to phase out the use of petroleum-based synthetic dyes in the nation’s food supply during a press conference at the Department of Health and Human Services in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 22, 2025. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz
    Elizabeth Frantz | Reuters

    Makary added that the agency plans to authorize four additional color additives using natural ingredients in the coming weeks, while also expediting the review and approval of other natural ingredient colors.

    Makary cited a Lancet study that concluded that artificial colors in the diet “result in increased hyperactivity.”

    “The F in FDA stands for food,” he said. “Now, there’s no one ingredient that accounts for the child chronic disease epidemic. And let’s be honest, taking petroleum-based food dyes out of the food supply is not a silver bullet that will instantly make America’s children healthy, but it is one important step.”

    Last month, Kennedy told top food executives that removing artificial dyes from the food system is an urgent priority of the Trump administration. Meeting attendees included the CEOs of PepsiCo North America, Kraft Heinz, General Mills, Tyson Foods, WK Kellogg, J.M. Smucker and the Consumer Brands Association, the industry’s top trade group.

    Kennedy has used Kellogg’s Froot Loops as his primary example when railing against artificial colorants.

    While it is unclear exactly how removing dyes could affect the companies’ businesses, it will be a major effort to overhaul recipes — and the new looks could affect how consumers perceive the products.

    Makary said phasing out petroleum-based food dyes won’t increase food prices, pointing to other countries that have made similar moves. However, synthetic dyes are generally more cost-effective than natural alternatives, which often require larger quantities to achieve vibrant colors and can carry higher production costs, according to some reports and one natural ingredient manufacturer.

    Previously, pushback from consumer advocates led some of the companies to tweak their formulas and drop artificial dyes without any government intervention. In 2015, Kraft Heinz changed the recipe of its trademark mac and cheese to use the same natural colors found in the European version of the product.

    But the changes don’t always stick. In 2017, General Mills reversed course, putting its artificially colored Trix cereal back on shelves. The naturally dyed cereal, which used turmeric, radishes and purple carrots, was not as vibrant, and customers rejected the new version.

    Kennedy is at the helm of a $1.7 trillion agency that oversees food and tobacco products, vaccines and other medicines, scientific research, public health infrastructure and government-funded health care. After just two months on the job, he has drastically changed the nation’s federal health agencies.


    U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. leaves the stage after discussing the findings of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) latest Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network survey, at the Department of Health and Human Services in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 16, 2025.
    Elizabeth Frantz | Reuters

    In March, he announced plans to slash 10,000 full-time employees across different departments and consolidate divisions. He has cut back crucial parts of HHS, including offices that handle HIV prevention efforts and work to eliminate health-care disparities. The Food and Drug Administration is also suspending a quality control program for testing fluid milk and other dairy products due to reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, Reuters reported on Tuesday.

    Kennedy’s so-called Make America Healthy Again platform argues a corrupt alliance of drug and food companies and the federal health agencies that regulate them are making Americans less healthy. He has pledged to end the chronic disease epidemic in children and adults, and has been vocal about making nutritious food, rather than drugs, central to that goal.

    In January, before President Donald Trump or Kennedy took office, the Food and Drug Administration revoked its authorization of one type of red food dye called Red No. 3. The dye is known to cause cancer in laboratory animals, but food manufacturers were allowed to use it for years because scientists didn’t believe it raised the risk of cancer in humans at the level it is typically consumed.

    At least one company is benefitting from the ban on artificial dyes: McCormick, which helps companies tweak their flavors and formulas.

    “Now, reformulation activity has always been a part of the work that we do with our customer base, and we’ve been doing that for quite some time, but we are seeing a tick up in reformulation activity,” McCormick CEO Brendan Foley told analysts on the company’s earnings call in late March, adding that companies are seeking help cutting both artificial colors and sodium from their products.
    Brian

  • #2
    This feels like a monumental waste of resources given other health issues that face the public, and especially children. And, this is coming at a time when federal funding for pediatric care, cancer research, and global disease remediation is being sharply cut or eliminated, and while a large percentage of Americans have unignorable concentrations of forever chemicals (which are undeniably linked to chronic disease, and cancers) and lead (!!) in their drinking water.

    It seems easy enough to avoid most dyes as a personal choice as they primarily exist in "junk" foods, although not all. Cigarettes are still legal to manufacture as are absolutely terrible-for-you supplements that claim to promote health (but, interestingly, aren't FDA-evaluated!)--but we're going after...dyes used in junk food, which haven't been linked to many of the chronic diseases alleged.

    But hey, we're living in the stupidest timeline. Crack open a Brawndo and enjoy!
    History will judge the complicit.

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm generally in agreement with you, this is a small beans issue. But I also know that some people are violently upset about the use of the artificial food dyes ... DW included (mild point of contention, as I simply don't care). Frankly, I think it's another meme outrage primarily fuelled by social media "experts"/influencers, with very little/zero evidence-backed behavioural & other claims. Though a couple of them do at least have some legit science showing negative (cancerous) outcomes.

      True, it is generally fairly easy to avoid the food dyes, because as you said, they're mostly just used in highly processed/unhealthy/junk food. However, many of those foods are omnipresent & it's always a challenge for our kids at birthday parties, school/team/church events, and so on.

      That said, most of what RFK spouts off about is ludicrous, if not outright harmful. This is probably one of his *more* rational actions ....

      Comment


      • #4
        Nice to see an administration standing up to the food giants that have been poisoning us for decades.

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm with kork on this one. I don't care enough but it'll help the average person. Too bad they likely will be buying more processed foods with the rising cost of food.
          LivingAlmostLarge Blog

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by ua_guy View Post
            Cigarettes are still legal to manufacture as are absolutely terrible-for-you supplements that claim to promote health
            But as an adult, if I choose to buy a pack of cigarettes, or a case of beer, I understand there are health risk associated with these products. I can balance the risk and decide if I want to smoke a couple of cigarettes a couple times a year while out on the lake with my friends, or if I want to smoke three packs a day. If I decide to have one beer with dinner at a restaurant or knock out a six pack every night of the week. I understand what the results of these choices are.

            A kid who runs up and grabs a bag of chips or downs a soda (I am a fan of Strawberry Fanta personally) doesn't have a clue what the effects of the ingredients are long term.

            Originally posted by ua_guy View Post
            which haven't been linked to many of the chronic diseases alleged.
            That is the same as "have been linked to some chronic diseases"

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by myrdale View Post
              But as an adult, if I choose to buy a pack of cigarettes, or a case of beer, I understand there are health risk associated with these products. I can balance the risk and decide if I want to smoke a couple of cigarettes a couple times a year while out on the lake with my friends, or if I want to smoke three packs a day. If I decide to have one beer with dinner at a restaurant or knock out a six pack every night of the week. I understand what the results of these choices are.

              A kid who runs up and grabs a bag of chips or downs a soda (I am a fan of Strawberry Fanta personally) doesn't have a clue what the effects of the ingredients are long term.


              That is the same as "have been linked to some chronic diseases"
              I'm not against discouraging the use of some artificial dyes. I do think there's a lot of junk science and social media circus around this, and it's a dog whistle to the lowest denominator from someone who has been vehemently anti-vaccine and anti-science. I think "this" as a priority is incredibly misplaced. Not that it isn't a priority to remove harmful substances from food, but in terms of the things the FDA should be doing and paying attention to, it's much less important.

              I guess we have to celebrate the small wins we can get from this "leadership". Yay!? No more Mountain Dew for you.
              History will judge the complicit.

              Comment


              • #8
                I’d like to see high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) banned.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Jluke View Post
                  I’d like to see high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) banned.
                  That would require tangling with Big AG, Farmers, and Big Oil. They aren't going to give up their corn profits, genetically engineered corn, engineered fertilizer profits without kicking and screaming. HFCS and corn for ethanol production, fairly sure those are here to stay whether we want them or not.

                  HFCS is another avoidable ingredient in foods. Giving it up encourages eating unprocessed foods.
                  History will judge the complicit.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by ua_guy View Post

                    I'm not against discouraging the use of some artificial dyes. I do think there's a lot of junk science and social media circus around this, and it's a dog whistle to the lowest denominator from someone who has been vehemently anti-vaccine and anti-science. I think "this" as a priority is incredibly misplaced. Not that it isn't a priority to remove harmful substances from food, but in terms of the things the FDA should be doing and paying attention to, it's much less important.
                    Yep, this exactly. It's goodness, but should probably be prioritized well below many other (more significant) health concerns ... Like truly addressing obesity perhaps as a starter?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Maybe it will do some good. The highly processed foods will not be as pretty-maybe that will have a side effect that folks won't buy and consume as much?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by ua_guy View Post

                        That would require tangling with Big AG, Farmers, and Big Oil. They aren't going to give up their corn profits, genetically engineered corn, engineered fertilizer profits without kicking and screaming. HFCS and corn for ethanol production, fairly sure those are here to stay whether we want them or not.

                        HFCS is another avoidable ingredient in foods. Giving it up encourages eating unprocessed foods.
                        This is a big one as big as artificlal food coloring. In some ways more.
                        LivingAlmostLarge Blog

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X